Ref.
2025/MEEP/12697
Job offer type
Experts
Type of contract
Service contract
Activity sectors
Justice
Deadline date
2025/03/07 14:40
Duration of the assignment
Short term
Contract
Freelancer
Duration
24 worked days
Département Gouvernance - GOUV > Pôle Justice
Published on : 2025/02/13
Given the complexity of the project, and its importance to advance the judicial reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in line with recommendations made in the project M&E plan, the project team wishes to carry out an external mid-term evaluation.
This mid-term evaluation is planned to enable the project to assess its current progress and effectiveness, allowing stakeholders to gain new insights and additional knowledge necessary for informed decision-making. It will facilitate strategic reflection mid-term, especially in the context of the upcoming steering committee meeting, where shared assessments will be crucial for ensuring the good governance of the project. Furthermore, this evaluation will support the development of strategies and adaptations that may be necessary for the project's continued success, either in its current phase or as a foundation for a potential second phase.
This evaluation is a milestone for the project to ensure its accountability to the donor (the EU Delegation in Sarajevo) the implementing agency (Expertise France), and the project key beneficiaries, i.e. the HJPC, the Integrity Unit within the HJPC Secretariat, and the ODC; all Ministries of Justice (MoJs) in BiH, and Brčko District Judicial Commission; the Parliaments, Project Budget Office, all courts and prosecutors' offices, the judicial and prosecutorial training centres in entities (JPTCs) and others as listed above.
The main objective of this evaluation is to provide the HJPC, the Integrity Unit within the HJPC Secretariat, and the ODC; all Ministries of Justice (MoJs) in BiH, the agency Expertise France (field and head office teams), the EU Delegation in Sarajevo, other donors and international organisations, and the general public:
· a comprehensive, independent assessment of the performance of EU4Justice Phase II, paying particular attention to the mid-term results, against the agreed objectives,
· lessons and recommendations, to improve, where relevant, current and future work.
The evaluator should provide evidence to explain the analyses, cause and effect linkages and attempt to identify any factors that are enhancing or hindering progress. Their work must foster accountability, decision-making, and learning.
SEE ATTACHED Terms of Reference
As applicant for EU membership, Bosnia and Herzegovina (‘BiH’) is expected to meet EU justice standards as provided for by several of the 14 key priorities for membership and recalled by the EU Commission in its 2018 Western Balkan Strategy.
BiH’s complex and fragmented institutional structure has led the country to a difficult situation, regarding rule of law. No recent progress was made in this field and “lack of commitment to judicial reform from political actors, and the poor functioning of the judicial system continued to undermine the citizen’s enjoyment of rights and the fight against corruption and organised crime”.
The cross-cutting objective of this action is to share practical methods with the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council (the ‘HJPC’) and other Justice Institutions of BiH to increase its capacities to implement its mission to ensure independence and professionalism of the judiciary, promote judicial reform, and enhance the country’s response to organised crime and corruption. This Action aims at supporting the Justice Sector Institutions in carrying out these changes to align the functioning of the judiciary with EU rule of law standards by enhancing professionalism, efficiency and transparency of the BiH justice system for the final benefit of BiH citizens
1) Number of experts per assignment: 1
2) Profile of appointed expert(s) to undertake the contract:
Qualifications and experience
· Advanced degree in a relevant field such as law, public administration, political science, international relations, or project management, with a special focus on governance, justice reform, or international development.
· 10 years of proven experience in conducting evaluations of EU-funded projects, particularly mid-term evaluations with a focus on justice sector reforms, governance, or institutional capacity building.
· Extensive knowledge of the judiciary and justice systems, including familiarity with the legal and institutional frameworks in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), and experience working with judicial bodies such as courts, prosecutors, and Ministries of Justice.
· Strong understanding of EU policies and donor-funded programmes in the region, particularly in governance, rule of law, and institutional strengthening.
· Experience working with key stakeholders such as government institutions, international agencies, and civil society organisations, including effective communication and negotiation skills.
· Analytical skills and the ability to link cause and effect relationships, demonstrating the capacity to assess complex projects, identify key factors affecting progress, and provide actionable recommendations.
· Familiarity with gender-sensitive and inclusive evaluation methodologies, ensuring that the evaluation addresses key cross-cutting issues such as inclusivity and non-discrimination.
· Ability to produce high-quality reports that meet EU standards for evaluation, with attention to clarity, evidence-based analysis, and strategic recommendations.
Technical skills:
· Good knowledge of M&E systems for development programs and projects
· Experience and knowledge of field-based M&E
· Development of evaluation systems
· Design, delivery and evaluation of M&E training for adults
· Experience in database design and management
· Knowledge sharing and design of learning materials
Administrative skills:
· Excellent command of Microsoft Office tools (MS Office: Word, Excel, PowerPoint and LibreOffice equivalents) and the Internet
· Excellent communication and organizational skills
Language skills:
· Excellent command of written and spoken English (good writing, synthesis and analysis skills, etc.).
· Proficiency in local languages would be viewed favourably.
The evaluator may be an independent evaluator and/or an evaluation agency.
Tenders should include:
· Technical outline: demonstrate an understanding of and comment on the terms of reference, methodology, CVs and similar experience, and include the components mentioned in the terms of reference (detailed workplan).
· Financial outline: overall budget for the evaluation, including the following: daily cost of the evaluator; breakdown of time by phase; additional costs (services and additional documents); The project will cover travel expenses, per diem and translation costs directly;
· The Project Manager will receive the technical and financial proposals prepared by the potential contractor(s) which should include:
· An understanding of the ToR;
· An indicative methodological design;
· A planned schedule;
· A description of the team members’ responsibilities,
· A curriculum vitae (CV) and a signed statement of absence of conflict of interest (template annexed)
The selection process for candidates will be based on the following criteria :
Deadline for application : 2025/03/07 14:40
File(s) attached : Evaluation ToR_EU4Justice II_Final_Feb25.docx - DAJ_F030ENG_v04 - Sworn statement on exclusion criteria, the absence of conflict of interest.docx
Expertise France is the public agency for designing and implementing international technical cooperation projects. The agency operates around four key priorities :
In these areas, Expertise France conducts capacity-building initiatives and manages project implementation, leveraging technical expertise and acting as a project coordinator. This involves combining public sector expertise with private sector skills to drive impactful results.