Postuler

Réf.
2026/IEOSJAIADS/16571

Type d'offre
Experts

Type de contrat
Contrat de prestation de services

Date limite de candidature
16/11/2026 23:55

Durée de la mission
Long terme

Durée
42 months

Description de la mission

Objectives and desired results

1) General objective

To provide high-quality international expertise, analytical support and capacity-development assistance to the High Council of Justice, the Service of Disciplinary Inspectors and other relevant judicial institutions in strengthening judicial accountability, integrity and disciplinary systems in line with European standards, including through the analysis of legislation, disciplinary practice and case-law, assessments and expert opinions on issues arising in the course of reform implementation.

2) Specific objectives

•  Develop a standardized template for disciplinary proceedings documents and related guidance to promote the consistency and quality of HCJ disciplinary practice.

•  Design and deliver targeted capacity-building for disciplinary inspectors of the SDI on disciplinary proceedings, decision-making and the application of European standards.

•  Prepare analytical notes with recommendations on unifying and improving the judicial integrity framework, including integrity indicators, conflict-of-interest mechanisms and verification procedures.

•  Provide, upon request of the Project, legal and policy analysis of legislation, draft laws, secondary legislation, disciplinary and judicial practice and case-law, as well as assessments and expert opinions on other issues relevant to judicial accountability, integrity and ethics.

3) Anticipated results

•  A standardized template for disciplinary proceedings documents and related guidance developed and presented to the HCJ.

•  Increased professional knowledge and practical skills of SDI disciplinary inspectors in conducting disciplinary proceedings and applying European standards.

•  Recommendations on unifying and improving the judicial integrity framework developed and presented to the beneficiaries.

•  Beneficiaries and the Project are provided with timely expert analysis of legislation, draft laws, disciplinary practice and case-law, assessments and expert opinions supporting evidence-based decision-making.

•  Strengthened cooperation and knowledge exchange between Ukrainian judicial institutions and EU counterparts, with European best practices integrated into Project outputs.

• International expertise and EU Member States’ practices integrated into Project outputs and technical assistance activities.

Description of the assignment

1) Planned activities

The Expert shall work under the overall supervision of the Senior National Key Expert on Judiciary Reform and Pillar 1 Lead, and in close coordination with other Project experts and relevant beneficiary institutions.

Depending on the specific assignment and area of expertise, the Expert may be required to provide some or all of the following services:

A. Templates, analytical notes and methodologies

•  Analyze HCJ disciplinary decisions and related procedural documents to identify inconsistencies, recurring shortcomings and good practices in their structure, reasoning and quality.

• Develop a standardized template for disciplinary proceedings documents, together with methodological guidance on its application.

•  Prepare analytical notes with recommendations on unifying and improving the judicial integrity framework, including unified integrity indicators, conflict-of-interest mechanisms, integrity declaration verification procedures and ethical standards.

• Conduct comparative research on judicial disciplinary and integrity systems in EU Member States and identify approaches relevant to Ukraine.

B. Training and capacity development

•  Assess the training needs of SDI disciplinary inspectors and design a targeted capacity-building program on disciplinary proceedings, decision-making and the application of European standards.

•  Prepare training agendas, presentations, case studies, practical exercises and other training materials, and deliver training sessions, workshops and mentoring.

•  Facilitate peer-learning with relevant EU counterparts, consultations and knowledge-sharing events on the regulatory framework and business processes for integrity declaration verification, ethical standards and disciplinary liability.

C. Analysis of legislation and case-law, assessments and expert opinions

•  Upon request of the Project, provide legal and policy analysis of the legislation, draft laws, secondary legislation and internal regulations governing judicial accountability, disciplinary liability, integrity, ethics, conflict of interest and the status of judges, including their compliance with European standards and Ukraine’s EU accession commitments.

•  Analyse the disciplinary practice of the HCJ, the practice of other judicial governance and self-government bodies, the case-law of the Supreme Court, and relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU, and identify trends, inconsistencies and implementation challenges.

•  Conduct needs assessments, functional and institutional assessments, gap analyses, surveys and other assessments of judicial institutions, procedures and practices in the field of accountability and integrity, and prepare findings and recommendations.

•  Prepare expert opinions, analytical notes, comparative studies, policy briefs, comments and proposals on draft legal acts, codes of ethics, strategies, action plans and other documents relevant to Result 1.4, including in response to ad hoc requests from the beneficiaries.

•  Contribute to the monitoring of the implementation of relevant reform measures, GRECO and other international recommendations and interim benchmarks, and to the preparation of the Project’s analytical and reporting inputs.

D. Representation of the Project’s position and results of work

• Participation in working groups, meetings or other working and coordination platforms dedicated to judicial accountability, integrity, ethics and disciplinary practice.

•  Presentation of papers, studies and other materials prepared by the expert under the assignment received from the Project during public events and working meetings.

2) Anticipated deliverables

Deliverables:

D1. Templates, analytical notes and methodologies. Analysis of HCJ disciplinary practice; standardized template for disciplinary proceedings documents with methodological guidance; analytical notes with recommendations on unifying and improving the judicial integrity framework; comparative research on EU Member States’ practices, in written or oral form, as agreed with the Project.

D2. Training and capacity development. Training needs assessment, design and delivery of capacity-building activities for SDI disciplinary inspectors and other relevant staff, preparation of training materials, and facilitation of peer-learning and knowledge-sharing events.

D3. Analysis of legislation and case-law, assessments and expert opinions. Upon request of the Project, legal and policy analysis of legislation, draft laws and secondary legislation; analysis of disciplinary and judicial practice and case-law; needs, functional and institutional assessments; expert opinions, analytical notes, comparative studies and comments on draft documents relevant to Result 1.4, in written or oral form, as agreed with the Project.

D4. Representation of the Project’s position and results of work. Participation and presentation of expert deliverables during public events, working groups, meetings or other working and coordination platforms dedicated to judicial accountability, integrity, ethics and disciplinary practice.

3) Consultation

The Expert shall work under the overall supervision of the Senior National Key Expert on Judiciary Reform and Pillar 1 Lead.

The Expert shall maintain regular communication with the designated Project experts concerning the prioritization and allocation of analytical and capacity-development tasks; the scope, methodology and expected outputs of expert products; legal questions, disciplinary cases and factual materials requiring assessment; consultations with the HCJ, the SDI and other relevant beneficiaries; the preparation and delivery of training and knowledge-sharing events; participation in working groups and coordination mechanisms; the submission, review and revision of deliverables; and any circumstances that may affect the quality, timeliness or impartiality of the assignment.

The Expert shall promptly communicate any potential conflict of interest, including any current or past involvement in disciplinary proceedings concerning judges, confidentiality concern or other circumstance that may affect the performance of the assignment.

4) Implementation period

Start date: January 2027

End date: June 2030

Effective duration of the assignment: 42 months

5) Place of performance

The assignment shall primarily be performed on a home-based basis. Frequent travel to and within Ukraine may be required, upon formal request by Expertise France and subject to applicable security and contractual arrangements.

Participation in meetings, consultations and other Project activities may take place in person or online, subject to prior agreement with the Program Key Expert.

Description du projet ou contexte

The PravoJustice4EU Program, implemented by Expertise France (EF) with funding from the European Union and the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, supports Ukrainian authorities in the continued reform and strengthening of the justice sector.

PravoJustice4EU is structured around two specific objectives: supporting the EU accession process by aligning the Ukrainian justice system with EU standards, including independence, efficiency, quality, integrity, transparency and access to justice; and supporting accountability for core international crimes in line with European and international standards while fostering a holistic transitional justice approach.

Within this framework, the Program will continue to support the judicial reform in Ukraine, with the aim of strengthening the accountability, integrity and disciplinary systems for judges in line with European standards.

The Program’s primary focus is to support Ukraine in fulfilling its EU integration commitments in the area of the judiciary, in particular those set out in the Ukraine Facility Plan, the Interim Benchmarks for Ukraine under Chapter 23 “Judiciary and Fundamental Rights”, the Rule of Law Roadmap, and the commitments arising from the Joint Statement of 11 December 2025 by European Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos and Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine Taras Kachka.

Under Result 1.4 “Accountability, integrity, and disciplinary systems for judges and prosecutors are effective”, the International Experts will provide specialized international expertise, analytical support and capacity-development assistance to the High Council of Justice (HCJ), including the Service of Disciplinary Inspectors (SDI), and other relevant judicial institutions under the following activities of the Program: A 1.4.1. Support the further development and implementation of an effective judicial integrity framework, including unified integrity indicators, conflict-of-interest mechanisms and relevant verification procedures, unification and enhancement of the quality of disciplinary practice, including A 1.4.1.1. Development of a standardized template for disciplinary proceedings documents to promote consistency and quality of HCJ disciplinary practice, A 1.4.1.2. Development and delivery of a targeted capacity-building training for disciplinary inspectors of the SDI, including practical training on disciplinary proceedings, decision-making, application of European standards, and peer-learning with relevant EU counterparts, and A 1.4.1.3. Development of an analytical note with recommendations on unifying and improving the judicial integrity framework.

Beyond these specific activities, the International Experts will also provide, upon request of the Project, broader expert support under Result 1.4, including the analysis of legislation and draft laws, assessments and expert opinions on emerging issues relevant to judicial accountability, integrity and ethics and to the implementation of the relevant Ukraine Facility Plan steps, Interim Benchmarks and Rule of Law Roadmap measures.

The assignment will contribute to the fulfilment of Ukraine’s EU accession commitments in the area of the judiciary, more consistent, transparent and high-quality disciplinary practice, a coherent judicial integrity framework and stronger professional capacity of disciplinary inspectors. It will also facilitate the exchange of experience between Ukrainian judicial institutions and judicial councils and disciplinary bodies of EU Member States, promote the application of European best practices, and ensure the integration of international expertise into the Project’s technical assistance and capacity-development activities.

Profil souhaité

A. Qualifications and skills:

•  Advanced university degree (Master’s degree or PhD) in law.

• Strong knowledge of judicial independence and accountability, and the functioning of judicial governance and self-government bodies.

• Strong knowledge of European standards on judicial ethics, integrity and disciplinary liability of judges, including relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.

• Excellent legal research, comparative analysis and drafting skills, including the ability to develop practical methodologies, templates and recommendations.

• Ability to analyze disciplinary practice and decisions and translate findings into practical recommendations.

• Strong stakeholder consultation, facilitation and training skills.

• Fluency in written and spoken English is required. Knowledge of Ukrainian will be considered an asset.

B. General professional experience

•  At least 5 years of professional experience in the judicial system, legal research, judicial governance, disciplinary proceedings or another closely relevant field.

• Experience in preparing analytical studies, methodologies or policy recommendations for judicial institutions.

• Experience in cooperating with judicial councils, disciplinary bodies, courts, European judicial networks, international organizations or international technical assistance projects.

C. Specific professional experience

●   Knowledge of and practical experience in judicial disciplinary procedures, including the analysis of disciplinary practice and the drafting or review of disciplinary decisions and procedural documents.

●   Professional experience in or with judicial councils, judicial inspection or disciplinary bodies, or judicial ethics bodies of EU Member States, or with relevant European bodies and networks (such as ENCJ, CCJE or GRECO).

●   Knowledge of professional ethics and integrity standards for judges, including integrity indicators, conflict-of-interest rules and integrity declaration verification procedures.

●   Experience in legal analysis of legislation and draft laws, analysis of judicial practice and case-law, and in conducting institutional or needs assessments in the justice sector.

●   Experience in comparative research on EU Member States’ judicial systems and identifying approaches relevant to Ukraine.

●   Experience in designing and delivering training or other capacity-building activities for judges, disciplinary inspectors or staff of judicial institutions.

●   Experience in facilitating working groups, stakeholder consultations or knowledge-sharing events for judicial institutions.

●   Previous experience in supporting judicial reform through EU-funded technical assistance projects is an asset.

●   Knowledge of the Ukrainian judicial system and its reform context is an asset.

Critères de sélection des candidatures

Le processus de sélection des candidats s'opérera selon le(s) critère(s) suivant(s) :

  • Formation/compétences/expériences du candidat
  • Compétences du candidat en lien avec la mission d’expertise
  • Expériences du candidat en lien avec la mission d’expertise
  • Évaluation de l’expertise du candidat dans le domaine recherché

Date limite de candidature : 16/11/2026 23:55

Document(s) joint(s) : TOR_ISTE_Experts_Result_1.4_Judicial_Accountability_Integrity_Discipline (1).docx

Ce site web utilise des cookies pour la réalisation des statistiques de visites. Ils nous permettent également d'assurer un bon fonctionnement de nos services. En poursuivant votre navigation, vous acceptez l'utilisation de ces cookies.
Pour plus d'informations, Lire la politique des cookies >>.