Postuler

Réf.
2026/PCAAEFTMOE/16251

Type d'offre
Experts

Type de contrat
Contrat de prestation de services

Date limite de candidature
08/10/2026 23:55

Durée de la mission
Long terme

Durée
170 days

Description de la mission

Description of the assignment

1. Target audience

The domestic public-narrative and advocacy campaign is designed around the following priority audience groups, each requiring tailored messaging, tone and channels:

Target audience

Relevance to the privatization campaign

General public / society

Primary audience for the domestic privatization narrative — addressing public concerns, myths and objections

Expert community and think tanks

Shape and validate the substantive framing of privatization policy; amplify analytical content

Media and journalists

Channel for public-facing articles, opinion pieces, explainers and coverage of privatization milestones

Business associations and independent experts

Platforms for placing analytical and advocacy content beyond official Ministry channels

Ministry leadership and SPFU

Recipients of speeches, talking points and coordinated messaging; source of positions to be publicly communicated

International partners

Audience for coordinated messaging on reform progress; stakeholders in advocacy for institutional decisions

Government stakeholders and MPs

Political buy-in and coordinated messaging in support of legislative and regulatory decisions

2. Planned activities

Assignment preparation

     Review existing documents and prior communication on privatization developed by the Ministry, SPFU and other State institutions; assess coherence and identify communication gaps.

     Map the key problems, public concerns, myths, objections and communication gaps surrounding privatisation, across the target audiences above.

     Develop the core privatization narrative and the three-month editorial plan; present it to Expertise France and the Ministry.

Phase I — Narrative development and editorial planning

     Develop an overarching privatization narrative and specific narratives for: full and partial privatisation, distressed assets, investor attraction, post-privatization support, and State ownership.

     Maintain a rolling editorial plan identifying topics, hooks, formats, channels, authors and deadlines.

     Independently propose new topics and formats in response to the political and information environment, rather than only responding to individual requests.

Phase II — Content production and placement

     Personally draft posts, articles, opinion pieces, analytical publications, Q&A, speeches, talking points and expert explainers.

     Take products through to actual publication — not only through official Ministry channels, but through partner, expert, business association and media platforms.

     Deliver at least four substantive public communication outputs on privatization each month.

Phase III — Coordination and advocacy

     Coordinate key messages among the main public-sector stakeholders (Ministry of Economy, SPFU, and other relevant institutions).

     Hold regular coordination calls with the SPFU-side Communication Support Expert on Privatization to keep messaging consistent and avoid duplication.

     Support advocacy for legislative, regulatory and institutional decisions related to privatisation.

Phase IV — Monitoring and risk management

     Monitor public and expert reaction, information risks and resistance to reform.

     Maintain and regularly update the information-risk map, with recommendations on the next communication actions.

     Rapidly adjust topics, messages and formats in response to monitoring findings.

3. Anticipated deliverables

Deliverable

End date

1. Map of issues and audiences, core privatization narrative, list of priority themes and a three-month editorial plan

T0 + 1 month

2. Monthly output plan identifying channels, authors, deadlines and approval status

Monthly

3. Thematic communication packages: long- and short-form publications, leadership materials, Q&A and expert explainers

Continuous / per editorial plan

4. At least four substantive public communication outputs on privatisation

Monthly

5. Publications and discussions placed through partner, expert, business and media platforms (beyond official Ministry channels)

Continuous / per editorial plan

6. Updated information-risk map and recommendations on next communication actions

Monthly

7. Draft speeches, talking points and expert explainers for Ministry and SPFU leadership

Upon request

8. Coordination notes on key messages agreed among public-sector stakeholders

Ongoing

V. Coordination

The service provider shall designate a single contact person for project implementation purposes.

Clement Lapointe will be the service provider’s sole contact person for Expertise France.

E-mail: clement.lapointe@expertisefrance.fr

A launch meeting shall be held 5 days after the contract award has been notified.

Bi-monthly coordination meeting must take place with Milena Komar, Component Coordinator for

Expertise France from assignment preparation right up to completion, alongside with SPFU’s team

and the liaison experts. Furthermore, regular exchanges must take place on assignment progress and

any difficulties that may be encountered. Weekly coordination calls with Privatization Communication

expert from MoE must take place in order to ensure alignment in messaging, activities and

deliverables.

Monthly report to Expertise France is required, highlighting main activities carried out during the

month, objectives and plan for the next; aggregate of data and analysis on public outreach and media

visibility.

VI. Place, duration and terms of performance

     1) Implementation period: 24 months

     2) Start date: upon signing date.

     3) End date: September 1, 2028

     4) Number of working days: 170.

     7) Payment terms: Monthly payment upon approval of the monthly report. Reimbursement of

expenses based on invoices.

 

Monitoring and evaluation

Performance indicators

Deliverable / activity

Indicator of effect

Verification source

Core narrative and editorial plan

Approval of the core privatization narrative and three-month editorial plan by the Ministry

Ministry communication focal point

Monthly output volume

At least four substantive public communication outputs on privatization published per month

Editorial plan tracker; published materials

Placement beyond Ministry channels

Share of outputs placed through partner, expert, business association or media platforms

Publication log; media monitoring

Information-risk monitoring

Regular updates to the information-risk map with actionable recommendations

Monthly report

Message coordination

Evidence of coordinated key messages across MoE, SPFU and other public-sector stakeholders

Coordination notes; weekly calls with the SPFU-side expert

 

Description du projet ou contexte

Context and justification of the need

The EU4SAR project (“European Union Programme for State Assets Reforms in Ukraine”) is implemented by Expertise France, in partnership with the State Property Fund of Ukraine (SPFU) and the Ministry of Economy and Environment of Ukraine(MoE), and is co-funded by the European Union and the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs. The programme supports the acceleration of privatization and liquidation of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and other state assets, and the transparency and governance of state assets more broadly.

Domestic and international audiences currently receive uneven and largely uncoordinated information on Ukraine's privatization and liquidation programme. The reform agenda needs a consistent, evidence-based domestic narrative capable of addressing public concerns, myths and objections, and of supporting the legislative, regulatory and institutional decisions that the programme's reform components are expected to generate.

III. Objectives and desired results

1. General objective

To build a consistent, evidence-based public narrative on privatisation, identify the key issues and themes for society and the expert community, and continuously turn them into concrete published and used communication products.

2. Specific objectives

     Map the key problems, public concerns, myths, objections and communication gaps surrounding privatisation.

     Develop an overarching privatization narrative and specific narratives for full and partial privatisation, distressed assets, investor attraction, post-privatization support and State ownership.

     Independently determine what should be communicated, to whom, when and through which voices; maintain an editorial plan and continuously propose topics, hooks and formats.

     Personally draft posts, articles, opinion pieces, analytical publications, Q&A, speeches, talking points, expert explainers and publication-ready materials.

     Secure actual outputs through the Ministry of Economy and Environment, Ministry leadership, SPFU, international partners, independent experts, think tanks, business associations and media, rather than limiting the role to event press releases.

     Coordinate key messages among the main public-sector stakeholders and support advocacy for legislative, regulatory and institutional decisions.

     Monitor public and expert reaction, information risks and resistance to reform, and rapidly adjust topics, messages and formats.

3. Anticipated results

A consistent, evidence-based public narrative on privatization is established and sustained, with at least four substantive public communication outputs published each month through both official Ministry channels and partner, expert, business and media platforms — supporting public understanding of the reform and advocacy for the legislative, regulatory and institutional decisions it requires.

Profil souhaité

Qualifications and skills

     Demonstrated practical experience communicating privatisation, economic reforms, State-asset reform or other complex and politically sensitive public-sector reforms.

     Strong Ukrainian-language writing and personal experience producing materials published or used by senior officials, expert organisations or media.

     Ability to shape a substantive agenda independently, rather than only responding to requests for individual press releases or posts.

     Understanding of Ukraine's political, institutional and media environment, and experience working with officials, experts, partners and journalists.

     Ability to turn complex legal, financial and political decisions into clear public arguments and take products through to actual publication.

     Fluency in Ukrainian; working proficiency in English is an advantage.

2. Professional experience

     Minimum 7 years of general professional experience.

     Minimum 5 years of experience in communications, public affairs, media relations or advocacy, preferably in government, reform support or economic policy contexts.

     Prior experience communicating privatisation, State-owned enterprise reform, or other complex and politically sensitive public-sector reforms is a strong advantage.

     Established relationships with Ukrainian media, expert organisations, think tanks or business associations are a strong advantage.

Informations complémentaires

     Document to be submitted by the candidates:

       CV;

       Financial proposal – daily rate to be indicated in the cover letter;

       Cover letter including a short methodological description of how the candidate intends to carry out the assignment (up to 2 pages).

II.      Evaluation Criteria for Supplier Selection

The selection of the expert will be based on the best value for money principle, combining both the financial proposal and the technical offer.

 Weighting of Criteria (100%) :

 

Criteria

Weight

Price offer

20 %

Tech offer

80 %

 Technical Offer – Evaluation Breakdown (80%)

 

Criterion

Weight

A. Relevance of Previous Assignments

Providing communicational support to the creation of comprehensive communication products

40%

B. Methodological Approach & Work Plan                           

Development of evidence-based domestic narrative capable of addressing public concerns, myths and objections, and of supporting the legislative, regulatory and institutional decisions that the programme's reform components are expected to generate.

40%

 

Critères de sélection des candidatures

Le processus de sélection des candidats s'opérera selon le(s) critère(s) suivant(s) :

  • Formation/diplômes du candidat en lien avec la mission d’expertise

Date limite de candidature : 08/10/2026 23:55

Ce site web utilise des cookies pour la réalisation des statistiques de visites. Ils nous permettent également d'assurer un bon fonctionnement de nos services. En poursuivant votre navigation, vous acceptez l'utilisation de ces cookies.
Pour plus d'informations, Lire la politique des cookies >>.