Réf.
2026/EALCSOPPRIU/16539
Type d'offre
Experts
Type de contrat
Contrat de prestation de services
Date limite de candidature
09/11/2026 12:19
Durée de la mission
Long terme
Durée
42 months
Département Géographique - GEO > DP - Ukraine
Mis en ligne le : 27/10/2026
EUROPE CONTINENTALE
UKRAINE
Description of the assignment
1) Planned activities
The Expert shall work under the overall supervision of the Key Expert on Public Prosecution Reform and Pillar 1 Lead, and in close coordination with other Project experts and relevant beneficiary institutions.
Depending on the specific assignment and area of expertise, the Expert may be required to provide some or all of the following services:
A. Strengthening prosecutorial governance and self-governance.
● Support the implementation of recommendations arising from the functional audits of the Council of Prosecutors of Ukraine and the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of Prosecutors.
● Develop recommendations and legislative proposals aimed at strengthening the institutional independence, autonomy, effectiveness and accountability of prosecutorial self-governance bodies.
● Contribute to the improvement of the mandates, composition, appointment procedures, decision-making processes and operational arrangements of the CoP and QDCP, including their secretariats.
● Provide expert advice on the development of transparent and objective procedures for the preliminary assessment and selection of candidates for membership of prosecutorial self-governance bodies
● Support capacity-building activities for members of the CoP and QDCP, their secretariats and prosecutors on the role of prosecutorial self-governance and its contribution to selection, evaluation of prosecutors and prosecutorial independence.
B. Merit-based selection and appointment of management-level prosecutors
● Support the development and review of legislation and procedures establishing transparent, competitive and merit-based selection of management-level prosecutors.
● Analyze proposed selection models, eligibility criteria, assessment methodologies and safeguards for ensuring objectivity, integrity and procedural fairness.
● Contribute to the development of transparent and effective procedures for the appointment and dismissal of the Prosecutor General, including follow-up to the comprehensive review of the existing legal framework and the preparation of relevant legislative proposals.
● Provide expert and methodological support for the implementation of new selection procedures, subject to the adoption of the relevant legislation and establishment of the necessary institutional arrangements.
С. Performance evaluation and professional development of prosecutors
● Support the development of a legal and methodological framework for the regular performance evaluation of prosecutors based on predefined, objective and transparent criteria.
● Develop recommendations on evaluation procedures, the participation of prosecutors in the assessment process, safeguards against arbitrary decisions and mechanisms for reviewing or appealing evaluation outcomes.
● Contribute to the development and implementation of methodological instruments and digital solutions supporting a consistent and effective system of performance evaluation.
● Support initiatives aimed at strengthening the professional development of prosecutors, including through the identification of training needs and the development of recommendations for improving training programs and institutional capacity.
D. Disciplinary proceedings and integrity framework
● Support the preparation and review of draft legislation, regulations and procedures governing disciplinary proceedings of prosecutors.
● Contribute to the development of measures aimed at strengthening integrity, preventing corruption and addressing ethical violations within prosecutorial bodies.
● Provide expert advice on the institutional capacity and working procedures of the relevant disciplinary and integrity bodies, including the QDCP and the General Inspectorate
● Support targeted capacity-building activities for relevant institutional stakeholders on disciplinary standards, integrity requirements and safeguards for fair proceedings.
E. Organizational development and efficiency of the prosecution service
● Prepare analytical assessments and recommendations on the organizational structure, distribution of functions, management processes and allocation of resources within prosecutorial bodies.
● Support the development of regulations, procedures and methodological instruments necessary to implement agreed optimization measures.
● Provide expert advice on mechanisms for the transparent and random allocation of criminal proceedings among prosecutors, including the development of relevant legislative and procedural safeguards
2) Anticipated deliverables
|
Deliverables: |
|
D1. Legislative and Analytical Outputs. Expert contributions to the preparation, review and revision of draft primary and secondary legislation, regulations, procedures and other policy documents related to prosecutorial reform, including analytical papers, legal opinions, policy recommendations and comparative legal analyses. Where relevant, these outputs shall include an assessment of compliance with applicable European standards, identification of legal and institutional gaps, and substantiated recommendations for addressing them. |
|
D2. Capacity-Development Activities and Materials. Preparation and delivery of agreed training sessions, workshops, seminars, mentoring activities and other capacity-development initiatives related to prosecutorial reform. Relevant outputs shall include agendas, presentations, training materials, case studies, practical exercises and brief activity reports, as appropriate. |
|
D3. Expert Contributions to Stakeholder Consultation and Coordination. Expert contributions to relevant working groups, inter-institutional consultations, policy discussions, roundtables and coordination meetings related to prosecutorial reform. Where required, the Expert shall prepare supporting analytical materials, discussion papers, written comments, meeting summaries and recommendations for follow-up. |
|
D.4. Activity Reporting. Periodic activity reports, in the format and at the intervals agreed with the Program, summarizing the assignments undertaken, work performed, outputs prepared or reviewed, consultations and capacity-development activities conducted, progress achieved, outstanding issues, risks and proposed next steps. At the end of the assignment, the Expert shall submit a final report summarizing the work completed, outputs delivered, their contribution to the Program objectives, outstanding matters and recommendations for further action. |
3) Consultation
The Expert shall work under the overall supervision of the Key Expert on Public Prosecution Reform and Pillar 1 Lead.
The Expert shall maintain regular communication with the designated Project experts concerning the prioritization and allocation of advisory, analytical and capacity-development tasks; the scope, methodology and expected outputs of expert products; cases, legal questions and factual materials requiring assessment; consultations with the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine and other relevant beneficiaries; the preparation and delivery of training, workshops and capacity-development activities; participation in working groups and coordination mechanisms; the submission, review and revision of deliverables; and any circumstances that may affect the quality, timeliness or impartiality of the assignment.
The Expert shall promptly communicate any potential conflict of interest, confidentiality concern or other circumstance that may affect the performance of the assignment.
4) Implementation period
Start date: January 2026
End date: June 2030
Effective duration of the assignment: 42 months
5) Place of performance
Remotely. Meetings, consultations, training and other on-site activities may require travel within Ukraine, subject to prior approval and security arrangements.
The PravoJustice4EU Program, implemented by Expertise France (EF) with funding from the European Union and the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, supports Ukrainian authorities in the continued reform and strengthening of the justice sector.
PravoJustice4EU is structured around two specific objectives: supporting the EU accession process by aligning the Ukrainian justice system with EU standards, including independence, efficiency, quality, integrity, transparency and access to justice; and supporting accountability for core international crimes in line with European and international standards while fostering a holistic transitional justice approach.
Within this framework, the Program will continue to support comprehensive prosecutorial reform, with the aim of strengthening the independence, impartiality, accountability, quality and efficiency of the prosecution service in line with European standards.
The Program’s primary focus is to support Ukraine in fulfilling its EU integration commitments in the area of prosecutorial reform, in particular those set out in the Ukraine Facility Plan, the Interim Benchmarks for Ukraine, the Rule of Law Roadmap, and the commitments arising from the Joint Statement of 11 December 2025 by European Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos and Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine Taras Kachka.
The National Expert on the Public Prosecution Reform in Ukraine will provide specialized expertise, advisory support and capacity-development assistance in relation to the prosecutorial reform in Ukraine in line with the European standards and Under Program’s following Results: A 1.2.7. Support the implementation of recommendations from the audit of prosecutorial self-government bodies and the reform of prosecutorial governance and self-government bodies (IBM 23.2.3); А 1.2.8. Support the establishment and operationalization of the pre-selection procedures for the candidates for members of the CoP and QDCP; A 1.2.9. Provide guidance and assistance on the optimization of the prosecutorial service to enhance its efficiency (IBM 23.1.2); A 1.3.5. Support the development and implementation of the legislation, regulations and procedures aiming at ensuring transparent and merit-based selection of management-level prosecutors (IBM 23.2.3); A 1.3.6. Support the development and implementation of the legislation aiming at establishing more transparent and merit-based selection and dismissal procedures of the Prosecutor General (IBM 23.2.3); A 1.3.7. Support the merit-based recruitment (selection to the district prosecutors’ offices) and transfer of prosecutors; A 1.3.9. Support the effective performance evaluation of prosecutors (IBM 23.3.2); A 1.4.2. Support the improving the disciplinary and integrity system for prosecutors (IBM 23.2.5); A 1.4.3. Support the introduction of the random allocation of cases (IBM 23.2.6); A 1.6.2. Provide programmers and training for prosecutors on integrity, professional ethics, protection of vulnerable groups, leadership, time management, communication, and other related areas (IBM 23.3.5).
A. Qualifications and skills:
• University degree in Law, International or European Law. A postgraduate qualification (Master’s, LL.M., PhD or equivalent) in criminal law, criminal procedure law or another relevant field will be considered an asset.
• Fluency in written and spoken English is required
• Excellent analytical, drafting and reporting skills.
B. General professional experience
• At least 10 years of relevant professional experience in criminal justice, prosecution services, criminal law
• Demonstrated experience in preparing legal opinions, case assessments, analytical notes, comparative studies and other practical legal products.
C. Specific professional experience
Candidates should demonstrate substantial knowledge and practical experience in one or more of the following areas:
● Practical experience within the prosecution service or criminal justice system of Ukraine, or academic expertise in criminal law/criminal procedure;
● Experience in prosecution reform processes, legislative drafting, or participation in relevant working groups.
● Knowledge of and/or practical experience in the establishment, design or operation of vetting, selection, evaluation or integrity assessment commissions, including the development of relevant legal frameworks, procedures, eligibility requirements, assessment criteria, methodologies, rules of procedure and safeguards ensuring transparency, impartiality, objectivity and procedural fairness
Le processus de sélection des candidats s'opérera selon le(s) critère(s) suivant(s) :
Document(s) joint(s) : TO_NSTE_PPO Reform.docx
Expertise France est l’agence publique de conception et de mise en œuvre de projets internationaux de coopération technique. L’agence intervient autour de quatre axes prioritaires :
Dans ces domaines, Expertise France assure des missions d’ingénierie et de mise en œuvre de projets de renforcement des capacités, mobilise de l’expertise technique et joue un rôle d’ensemblier de projets faisant intervenir de l’expertise publique et des savoir-faire privés.