Apply online

Ref.
2026/UENGFSP/15563

Job offer type
Experts

Type of contract
Service contract

Estimated budget
The Facility applies its own remuneration scale.

Activity sectors
Education, Higher Education and Research

Deadline date
2026/06/22 23:55

Duration of the assignment
Short term

Contract
Freelancer

Duration
27,5 days

Mission description

PLEASE REFER TO THE ToRs ATTACHED AT THE END OF THE WEBPAGE.

 

MAIN OBJECTIVES

The general objective of this assignment is to support UNITE and MoES/TETD in developing comprehensive, coherent, and implementable National Guidelines and Standards for both School Placement and Teacher Induction in Uganda, grounded in the findings and recommendations of the feasibility study and roadmap (CAP Activity 1.1.1, 2025).

The assignment pursues three specific objectives:

  1. To develop National School Placement Guidelines and Standards, standardising School Placement practices across all TTIs in Uganda with respect to duration, mentoring, supervision, assessment, and quality assurance.
  2. To develop a National Teacher Induction Framework and Guidelines, establishing the operational conditions for mandatory induction of newly qualified teachers, including probation linkage, mentor system, CPD integration, stakeholder roles, assessment, and TMIS/NTC registration.
  3. To produce an Implementation Monitoring Tool enabling MoES/TETD to track the initial roll-out of the guidelines against key indicators, in response to Activity 1.1.3 of the Country Action Plan.

Both guidelines documents must be grounded in the feasibility study and roadmap (Activity 1.1.1) and realistic within Uganda's current institutional capacities.

DELIVERABLES

Both experts are jointly responsible for the deliverables. The expected deliverables from this task are:

  1. Deliverable 1: Inception report.
    • To describe of the tasks being conducted, drawing from relevant documentation;
    • To state the purpose and scope of the task
    • To discuss the overall approach, potential risks and limitations;
    • To determine the methodology
    • To provide a workplan and discuss logistics
    • This document shall be concise.
  2. Deliverable 2: National School Placement Guidelines and Standards
  3. Deliverable 3: National Teacher Induction Framework and Guidelines
    • To formulate clear guidelines
    • To identify who is involved in the implementation of the guidelines, when and how
    • To explain why the guidelines were identified, why each one is relevant
    • To identify potential risks and limitations and propose mitigation measures; to specify tools required as annexes
    • To develop National School Placement Guidelines and Standards, standardising SP practices across all TTIs in Uganda with respect to duration, mentoring, supervision, assessment, and quality assurance.
    • To Develop a National Teacher Induction Framework and Guidelines, establishing the operational conditions for mandatory induction of newly qualified teachers, including probation linkage, mentor system, CPD integration, stakeholder roles, assessment.
    • Both documents must be grounded in the feasibility study and roadmap (Activity 1.1.1) and realistic within Uganda's current institutional capacities.
  4. Deliverable 4: Implementation Monitoring Tool (that is annexed to the National Teacher Induction Framework and Guidelines)
    • To provide MoES/TETD with a standalone, ready-to-use Implementation Monitoring Tool in response to Activity 1.1.3 of the CAP. 
    • To cover the following areas: (i) key implementation milestones for the first 6 months post-validation; (ii) a tracking grid with one verifiable indicator per key dimension (duration, mentoring, assessment, TMIS/NTC registration, CPD); (iii) early warning signals and escalation pathway to TETD, DEOs and the Facility.
    • This document will be annexed to the National Teacher Induction Framework and Guidelines. This document shall not exceed 3 pages.
  5. Deliverable 5: Final report.To provide with insights on the process that was conducted
    • To identify potential measures that could take over from this stage
    • This document shall be concise.

METHODOLOGY

The Applicant is expected to propose a more in-depth methodology in its application.

The indicative methodology is as follows but not limited to:

  1. A desk review of key policy and institutional documents, including the National Teachers Policy, the Education and Sports Sector Strategic Plan, Continuing Professional Development Framework, the feasibility study and the roadmap elaborated with RTIA’s support, and relevant international literature on school placement and induction in Sub-Saharan Africa.
  2. A scoping meeting with the Facility, MoES/TETD, UNITE and key partners, leading to the Inception Report including the methodology and an updated timetable taking into account workshops and the distribution between remote work and in-country missions
  3. Key informant interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders at national, district and school levels. The national consultant leads district and school-level consultations; the international consultant leads national and institutional consultations.
  4. A comparative review of school placement and induction programmes in at least two Sub-Saharan African countries (priority: Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania), identifying transferable design features relevant to Uganda.
  5. Iterative drafting of School Placement Guidelines and Standards- National Teacher Induction Framework and Guidelines, including all annex tools, with review cycles involving MoES/TETD 6. A Validation session co-organised by MoES/TETD with the financial support of the Facility, bringing together approximately 20 key national stakeholders, and leading to the finalisation of deliverables.

Throughout all steps, the methodology and deliverables must explicitly address gender and inclusion dimensions, ensuring equitable access to mentoring and induction support for women teachers, teachers in remote areas, and teachers with disabilities.

STAKEHOLDERS

During the assignment, a close collaboration is expected with the MoES and especially the TETD. In the purpose of a participatory approach, various actors should be met and involved at different stages of the study. Below is a non-exhaustive list of the relevant stakeholders:

Stakeholders to be involved in information gathering:

  • Basic Education Department (BED)
  • Direction of Human Resources in the MoES
  • Communication and Information Management Unit (LEIT)
  • TVET Trainers Training Research and Innovation (TTTRI)
  • Pre-school Section
  • Teacher Training Faculties/Institutions/University
  • Any institution from another country in the sub-region that has institutionalized the integration of an internship programme in initial teacher training.

Stakeholders to be involved in the elaboration of deliverables:

  • Uganda National Institute for Teacher Education (UNITE)
  • Teacher Training Institutions (TTI)
  • Teacher Education and Training Development (TETD)
  • Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development

Stakeholders who will benefit (directly or indirectly) from Technical Assistance:

  • Ministry of Education and Sports (MoES)
  • Teacher candidates (from Early Childhood Education programmes to secondary Education Level), Trainer educators

The consultant will also have to meet, at a minimum the GLPE coordination agency and the European Union Delegation (EUD).

SUBMISSION OF DELIVERABLES

The Expert will have to use the Facility’s template for the deliverables. The process of submission is the following:

  1. The expert submit a first version of the deliverable to the Facility from the RTIA;
  2. The RTIA review it. If the Facility from the RTIA has comments, it sends the deliverable back to the Expert. If the Facility from the RTIA has no comments, it sends the deliverable to the MoES.
  3. The MoES review it. If the MoES has comments, it sends the deliverable back to the Expert. If the MoES has no comments, the deliverable can be considered validated.

The MoES review may involve the organization of a workshop. Such organization would then be a matter between the MoES and the Facility from RTIA, not the Experts’. However in such case the Experts will be expected to lead the workshop.

Project or context description

THE REGIONAL TEACHER INITIATIVE FOR AFRICA

The Regional Teacher Initiative for Africa (RTIA), a programme funded by the EU via the Education section (G3) of DG INTPA aims to improve learning outcomes and the socio-emotional development of children in Africa, by having a more competent, motivated and inclusive teacher workforce in basic education.

 The RTIA will especially seek to achieve the following outcomes over the next 6 years:

  1. Improve the governance, management, attractiveness, and gender balance of the teaching profession, with a strong focus on increased digitalisation and innovation.
  2. Enhance the quality, relevance, and effectiveness of initial and continuous teacher professional development, notably through digital education, peer-to-peer learning approaches and regional collaboration.

Within RTIA, Facility will support teacher policy and improve teacher education and professional development systems by i) providing capacity building at country level through technical assistance, ii) promoting innovation and scaling of effective teaching solutions; iii) increasing the production and use of data and evidence, and iv) promoting the use of regional frameworks, evidence-based practices, and joint learning at regional level.

The Facility from the Regional Teachers Initiative for Africa (The Facility) will reach the above-mentioned objectives through 3 types of instruments or “windows”: i) a window to deliver technical assistance on teacher governance and teacher education and professional development based on the demand from eligible partner countries, ii) a window on testing and scaling effective programs for teacher education and professional development in the thematic areas of digital skills, gender, green skills, and pedagogical skills, including in the context of refugees and displaced population, iii) a research window to create new evidence and support the integration of evidence in the policy making process and in the design of teacher education and professional development programs.

In addition to these windows the Facility’s knowledge management and communication activities will further contribute to the sharing of knowledge, evidence, and best practices related to the overall Initiative outcomes.

The Facility is funded by the European Union and co-implemented by the Partnership formed by three member state agencies: Expertise France for France, Enabel for Belgium, EDUFI for Finland. Expertise France has been designated the Coordinating Agency for this Partnership. With the Facility governance scheme serving as the Initiative's governance scheme, it is expected that the Partnership will work closely with UNESCO and UAC, in charge of the other 2 components of the EU Initiative.

The duration of the action is scheduled from 01.02.2024 to 31.01.2030 with a budget of 92 000 000 €.

GENERAL CONTEXT IN THE COUNTRY

THE NATIONAL TEACHER POLICY (NTP) AND ITS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

In 2018, the Government of Uganda approved the National Teacher Policy (NTP) to professionalize the teaching force, establish rigorous standards, and enhance the development, management, and utilization of teachers. The policy intends to (a) streamline teacher Management for better productivity, discipline, retention, and motivation, (b) strengthen teacher training by enhancing both pre-service and in-service training to ensure teachers possess the competencies required for quality learning outcomes and leadership, (c) standardize teacher development, qualifications, and practice across all levels of education, and (d) streamline the integration of cross cutting issues into all aspects of teacher training, management, and practice at all levels.

KEY POLICY REFORMS AND IMPLEMENTATION STATUS

Uganda is currently implementing several landmark reforms emerging from the NTP. Applicants should note the following institutional and structural changes:

  • A future National Teacher Council (NTC) is envisaged as the professional regulatory body. While the NTC is the ultimate goal for teacher registration and licensing, the legislative process (NTC Bill) was cleared and the Bill assented by the president on 21st May, 2026; therefore, current activities must align with existing Ministry structures (TETD) while remaining "NTC-ready."
  • Establishment of the Uganda National Institute for Teacher Education (UNITE) - officially created in July 2024 - tasked with coordinating teacher education standards and programmes across all levels;
  • Admission criteria to initial teacher training has changed from Uganda Certificate of Education to Uganda (secondary 4) followed by 2 years of pre-service training, to an advanced Certificate of Education (secondary 6), followed by 3 years of pre-service training (Bachelor degree in education);
  • Introduction of a one-year mandatory Teacher Induction Programme for newly qualified teachers (Bachelor graduates), replacing the former internship model. Induction is a professional transition phase distinct from initial training, aimed at reducing early attrition and improving teaching quality from the first year of service.
  • Development and implementation of a teacher qualifications framework and standards for teaching and institutional leadership (Note: framework approved in 2016 needs revision and update);
  • Integration of cross-cutting issues like ICT, gender and environment into teacher training and management;
  • Development of a Teacher Information Management System (TMIS). Currently, the most active module on TMIS is the teacher registration module which enables all qualified teachers to register online and should be later linked to other education information systems (such as EMIS, the Teacher Effectiveness and Learner Achievement, HRM, E-learning portals, etc.).

DIGITALIZATION AND THE PEDAGOGICAL SHIFT

Following the COVID period that led to two full years of school closure in Uganda, MoEs is giving priority to digitalizing education and developing the teachers’ and children digital skills. Digital strategy documents have been developed (the Digital Agenda Strategy, and the Digital transformation Roadmap 2023-2028). Some actions in this direction are already being implemented with the support of partners, and in particular Enabel, UNICEF, UNESCO and the World Bank. There is a need for developing a structured approach to address key challenges such as the lack of a unified MoE platform for training content and resources, and the lack of clear implementation guidelines. Overall, there is a general sense that teachers lack the basic pedagogical skills to use ICT in their classrooms and in their lesson preparation, but there is still a need for better clarity on the way forward.

THE UGANDAN COUNTRY ACTION PLAN WITH THE RTIA

Please refer to the ToRs attached to this publication.

ARTICULATION WITH PREVIOUS ACTIVITY 1.1.1

This task follows on from CAP Activity 1.1.1, which aimed to conduct a feasibility study (first key deliverable, available since July 2025) and to design a roadmap for the induction program and school placement (second key deliverable, available since August 2025).

From the feasibility study, several key conclusions were identified in the feasibility study: (i) shifting towards an “induction programme” instead of an “internship programme”, (ii) advocating for a model based on mentoring, supervision and continuing professional development, and (iii) strengthening school practice.

The feasibility study’s first key conclusion is that a traditional internship is insufficient. It recommends replacing it with a 12-month Teacher Induction Programme (TIP). Unlike an internship, which is often seen as part of initial training, induction is defined as a professional transition phase for graduates (Bachelor’s degree holders) who are already in post or awaiting permanent appointment. Its objective would be to support newly qualified teachers in order to reduce the dropout rate and improve the quality of teaching from the very first year.

Second, the study advocates a model based on three interdependent pillars:

  1. Mentoring: each newly qualified teacher must be paired with an experienced teacher within the school (school-based mentor).
  2. Supervision: regular monitoring by the headteacher and tutors from training institutions (TTIs and UNITE).
  3. Continuing Professional Development (CPD): training sessions focused on classroom management and practical teaching methods throughout the year.

Third, the study concludes that placements during the bachelor’s degree must also be strengthened. It provides with several recommendation for strengthening it, such as the standardization of school placement across all TTIs, the development of standard school practices guidelines, based on the School Placement standards, the development of a system mentor development strategy, etc.

The second key deliverable – the roadmap – emerged from the feasibility study to conceptualise and examine options for an Induction year for newly qualified teachers, which is included in the NTP, as well as to examine the strengthening of School Placement, critical to effective initial teacher preparation. The goal was to identify the most feasible and effective strategies for supporting student teachers and newly qualified teachers in their transition to becoming competent professionals, in line with the vision of the NTP.

In its part about School Placement, the roadmap emphasizes the critical role of practical classroom experience in developing teaching competence and professional identity, to bridge the gap between theory and practice. The roadmap advocates for a "360-degree experience" where student teachers engage not only in classroom instruction but also in school management and community outreach.The strategic objectives of this roadmap include translating research findings into actionable priorities and establishing a phased, five-year operational plan that aligns with national resources. To ensure sustainability, the roadmap integrates Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEAL) frameworks to track progress and allow for adaptive management. Implementation responsibilities are distributed across various national and local bodies, with the Teacher Education and Training Department (TETD) providing overall coordination. Ultimately, these reforms aim to professionalize the teaching force and improve learner outcomes by ensuring that every newly qualified teacher is well-prepared and deeply rooted in their school community. This plan is organized into ten specific action areas, each with identified lead partners, clear timelines, and measurable success indicators. Key recommendations include adopting standardized nomenclature, extending the duration of placements to ensure students experience a full academic cycle, establishing a robust system for selecting and training school-based mentors and establishing School Practices Guidelines, which is the object of these Terms of Reference.

Required profile

The task will be conducted by two experts, one national (i.e. Ugandan) and international (i.e. with relevant and broad experience in several countries).

The Applicant can (but is not expected to) suggest with who the Applicant can be paired with. Then, both need to apply, in order to be eligible.

Academic qualification: At least a Master’s degree (or equivalent) in Education or Social Sciences

General work experience: At least 10 years of professional experience in the field of education (teaching, research, training, planning, evaluation, policy dialogue) in Uganda

Specific work experience:

  • At least 3 years of direct experience within Uganda's teacher education system, with demonstrated knowledge of its key institutions and their mandates (MoES/TETD, district education structures such as DEOs and inspectors).

Language proficiency: An advanced proficiency in english (C1-C2 according to CEFR scale or level III according to the UN Language Framework) is an added advantage

Interpersonal and soft skills:

  • Ability to work effectively in a diverse and multi-cultural team to achieve goals
  • Excellent analytical and summarizing skills and the ability to lead workshops or seminars

Additionnal asset:

  • Experience in developing national guidelines or standards for school placement or teacher induction (as lead author or major contributor)
  • Professional experience with international partners
  • Professional experience outside of Uganda
  • Proficiency in Swahili or in a recognized or indigenous language in Uganda
  • Knowledge of gender equality and relevant policy frameworks, including legislation on equal opportunities between men and women at European and African level

Additional information

TIMELINE

In the application, the Applicant is expected to detail a timeline.

The total workload is 55 days, equally divided between both experts. If the international expert’s residency is located outside Uganda, the number of days in Uganda is estimated at 19. An estimated timeline is provided in the ToRs attached. Though estimated here and detailed in the Applicant’s technical offer, the timeline will be subject to changes during the implementation of the activity.

HOW TO APPLY & SELECTION PROCESS

Please submit your personal application through this platform.

Though the application is to be submitted personally, please note that the contract will be signed between Expertise France and a Company (either of the  single-person company or an umbrella company). Before signing the contract, the company will have to show provide Expertise France legal documents, such as but not limited to, a proof a registration and tax and social security certificates.

In your application, please attach:

  • The CV (following Europass template)
  • A technical offer (of 10 pages maximum, without the annex) 
  • If possible, one to three samples of previous works that are similar to the above assignment, for which you should specify your role (main author, major contributions, minor contributions, etc.)

The selection is based on the CV and technical offer. The RTIA reserves the right to reject applications that do not include a CV or a technical proposal. 

At the Facility from RTIA, we value all experts as unique individuals, and we welcome the variety of experiences they bring to the Facility. As such, we have a strict non-discrimination policy. We believe everyone should be treated equally regardless of race, sex, gender identification, sexual orientation, national origin, native language, religion, age, disability, marital status, citizenship, genetic information, pregnancy, or any other characteristic protected by law. If you feel that you have been discriminated against, please let the RTIA team know as soon as possible. Every complaint will be appropriately investigated.

Selection criteria for applications

The selection process for candidates will be based on the following criteria :

  • Candidate’s training/skills/experience
  • Candidate’s training/diplomas related to the expert assignment
  • Candidate’s skills linked with the expert mission
  • Candidate’s experiences linked with the expert mission

Deadline for application : 2026/06/22 23:55

File(s) attached : 24-01-UGA-1-A-02_ToREx9_260524.pdf

Expertise France is the public agency for designing and implementing international technical cooperation projects. The agency operates around four key priorities :

  • democratic, economic, and financial governance ;
  • peace, stability, and security ;
  • climate, agriculture, and sustainable development ;
  • health and human development ;

In these areas, Expertise France conducts capacity-building initiatives and manages project implementation, leveraging technical expertise and acting as a project coordinator. This involves combining public sector expertise with private sector skills to drive impactful results. 

This website uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue we assume that you consent to receive all cookies on all websites.
For further information, please click here >>.